BioShockers delivered from DRM hell {El Reg}

After howls of pain from gaming addicts everywhere, 2K Games has eased the draconian DRM restrictions on its much ballyhooed new title BioShock.

That's just add-on to previous post regarding the mention of BioShock and restrictive Securom, see below. Sadly BioShock is one of the very few games, that has copy protection even in STEAM version on top of the STEAM's protection, d'oh.
read more | digg story

My views on..COPY PROTECTION (edited post from Steam Powered Forums)

Sera29 wrote @ Steampowered.com Forums (thread "tax and vat, realworld vs. online pricing")
Yes, it is the pirates fault. Thats why we have copy protection. Companies are entitled to payment for their goods, but some pple prefer to get those goods for free without paying for it. Companys are in the business to make money, they have a right to protect their investments. Yes, copy proetection sucks, but if pirates didnt steal goods and actually bought them letimately we wouldnt have to put up with it.

I lol'd. You miss one MAJOR point - there are always some people that are not going to buy -insert item- (e.g. money or morale issues), even if it would be un-reachable to get it for free, so any POTENTIAL "loss" should have been divided by 2 or 3.

Today's copy protection is all about money:
There's always some workaround, it's only matter of time, so the winner are the copy protections' developers in the end, 'coz they will come up with some new version again and earn more money. And I'm pretty sure they charge a lot!

I think companies should invest more money in development of the software itself, make sure it's good and the success will be imminent. I'm very annoyed by restrictive and aggresive copy protections like StarForce or Securom (read the 2K forums about 2 possible installs of BioShock RETAIL without contacting support for new serial key (AWFUL!) here., there will be some extending in future, but still way way too restrictive), that's why I use Steam and am really unhappy to see a game with additional protection.

I understand, that crack-proof copy protection might boost sales in the very first weeks/months, but it should stay that way and the protection should be disabled after certain time, because after the main wave, there is no big reason for it and it would make regular "paying" users happier. Why there is no reason, you ask?

Two basic figures:
1)The software isn't that good and there is only little attention from "the Scene", so people might get something more "supported".

2)It's actually good and crack/workaround is here and folks that really don't want to buy, won't buy it.

I found STEAM as a good platform for it (being member for a long long time), Nadeo has understood and did similar thing: there was SF in the recent Trackmania release, but they removed it after some time, just only with the basic STEAM system protection, which is the, I think, lesser evil of copy protections like StarForce or Securom. I'll probably support them for this action and buy my first Trackmania through Steam, I was enjoying Trackmania: Nations only until I figured out, that it uses SF.

I don't think my thoughts about copy protection are 100% right, I may went too far in few points and left out some, but they aren't that B&W like yours. Do you still think, it's that easy to judge it all in few sentences? Not speaking about other things than c. pr., that can help boost the sales like protection-free Galactic Civilization II's free upgrades for legal owners. Read interesting article about StarForce's fairness and jealousy called

Games CEO finds himself reluctant warez hero

Some bits:

Wardell said it was WalMart's best-selling game last week. Stardock's protection allows users to make copies of the CD, but unless they can provide a serial as proof of purchase, they won't be entitled to upgrades.

This was apparently too much for some supporters of copy protection. One example is StarForce, which sells a range of DRM software. In the forums section of its website, a StarForce employee posted a link to a Bittorrent seed of a pirate copy of GCII - to "prove" that Stardock was making a terrible mistake.

Wardell told us that the site hosting the Torrent took down the link as soon as it was informed - but StarForce didn't delete the links to the pirate software for 24 hours.

Maybe some companies should re-think their policy and some people should tune up the saturation from black and white to something more colourful...

I bumped into that Alan Sugar on memory lane...{El Reg}

Both business and personal story about Alan Sugar and Felix Dennis, two pretty much wealthy businessmen. The article is mainly about Alan Sugar, founder and owner of Amstrad, who had made fortune on his two-deck cassette recorders invention, then successfully infiltrated market with his computers and finally semi-retire providing TV boxes to SKY and got almost bought over by Murdoch.

Amstrad means a lot to me, Amstrad CPC 6128 has been my very first computer (see picture), imported and donated by family friend from Norway. I had spent A LOT of time in front of its colour monitor while playing classics like Freddy Hardest I&II, Cerberus, ICP Returns (something like that) or Crazy Cars, those were golden times. It's been pleasure to read this story about Alan Sugar, the one who brought me to get interested in computers in many ways..Without him I would be today somewhere completely else with it.

Picture source: machina.amigahellas.gr
Here's the full story:
read more | digg story